18 Nov 2007
“I’m sixty going on sixteen.” “I think that at the moment my brain functions even better than it did when I graduated from college 50 years ago.” “I’m convinced that I will live longer because I’m doing the Marshall Protocol.” Comments like these - which were made by actual patients in the MP phase II study trial - are increasingly common as people reach the later stages of the treatment. In fact, many Marshall Protocol patients who have recovered from inflammatory conditions, such as sarcoidosis, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, and others report that recovery feels like “being 20 years younger.”
In a 2006 paper in the Journal of Immunity and Aging, Italian researcher Sergio Giunta argues that inflammation and aging are intricately connected, to the point where the term “Inflammaging” has been coined “to explain the now widely accepted phenomenon that ageing is accompanied by a low-grade chronic, systemic up-regulation of the inflammatory response and that the underlying inflammatory changes are also common to most age-associated diseases.”[1]
Essentially, the wear and tear created by the inflammatory response plays a large role in generating the stress and tissue damage that perpetuate old age and eventually death. Central to this response? According to Giunta, the release of cytokines, or proteins that generate pain and fatigue.
Although Giunta attributes this release of cytokines to the effects of “autoimmune” disease, those of us familiar with Marshall’s research and the emerging understanding of the role that bacteria play in chronic disease realize that, in reality, the cytokine release and subsequent persistent inflammation observed in inflammatory disease is likely the result of infection with a chronic intraphagocytic metagenomic microbiota (often referred to as the Th1 pathogens).
“We have shown much chronic inflammation results from the body’s innate immune response [to the Th1 pathogens], and we agree it seems likely that ‘Inflammaging’ may also result from this same pathogenesis,” Marshall argues in a letter published in response to Giunta’s article. “Clearly we still have a lot to learn about the processes which society categorizes as ‘aging,” argues the biomedical researcher.
Since the Th1 pathogens are found nearly everywhere in our environment, everybody picks up the chronic bacterial forms as they grow older; which species one acquires is largely related to one’s unique infectious history. As people accumulate the Th1 pathogens, many of them create substances that dysregulate the Vitamin D Receptor, thus disrupting several of the intricate feedback pathways that keep the levels of the two vitamin D metabolites (25-D and 1,25-D) in the correct range.[2] 1,25-D goes up, and in the process, downregulates the level of 25-D in the body. Thus, a low level of 25-D is not a sign of “deficiency” but rather a strong indication that a person harbors a significant number of the Th1 pathogens.
If you were to graph the population’s 25-D levels on one axis and age on the other, the resulting graph would show that as a whole, the level of 25-D in the population drops steadily after age 40 – a clear indication that increasing age is correlated with a higher Th1 bacterial load. “Something is happening, even during ‘healthy aging’, that we really ought to understand a little more about,” says Marshall.
Not to mention the fact that as people grow older they increasingly succumb to diseases caused by the Th1 pathogens. “Our research points towards Th1 inflammation, the innate immune response to intraphagocytic pathogens, as being the cause of so many “diseases of the aging,” ranging from atherosclerosis, cardiomyopathy and arthritis through to many neurological conditions, and even to dementia,” states Marshall.
Many of the cells damaged by cytokines are stem cells – cells that act as a repair system for the body by replenishing other more specialized cells. But as people age, stem cells often lose their ability to repair and heal.
Interestingly, there is a high probability that the Th1 pathogens may be able to infect stem cells. “The key consideration is whether the Th1 bacteria infect stem cells,” says Marshall. Dr Emil Wirostko of Columbia University, one of the foremost experts on chronic bacterial forms, died before he could publish on the subject. But according to his colleagues, Wirostko believed persistent bacterial forms are able to infect stem cells.
This scenario begs the question - do stem cells lose much of their ability to heal and repair due to the increasing load of Th1 pathogens that everybody accumulates over a lifetime?
Indeed, since the Th1 pathogens are intraphgocytic (they are able to survive inside the nuclei of cells) they can likely interfere with the processes of transcription and translation as well as hamper DNA repair mechanisms. “The body has a number of redundant repair mechanisms,” states Marshall. “Actually I should use the word complementary as that is a better description. These defense mechanisms are affected by the pathogens, as evidenced by accelerated aging of folks with Th1 diseases.”
Marshall describes how at a recent conference on Aging at the University of California at San Diego, he heard a presentation[3] by a group of German researchers who had been studying the use of a patient’s own stem cells to repair heart tissue after a heart attack. Interestingly, the team discovered that people who had suffered a heart attack - an event which is most likely caused by certain species of the Th1 pathogens in the heart and blood vessels[4][5] - possessed stem cells which were only about half as effective at repairing the heart tissue as stem cells transplanted from healthy 20 year-old males. This supports the view that infected stem cells lack many of the healing properties maintained by their healthy counterparts. “It wasn’t a surprise to me,” says Marshall. “Although it was a big surprise for the researchers…”
New research suggests that the Th1 pathogens may also affect the aging process in ways not connected to the inflammatory response, namely by affecting sequences of DNA known as telomeres.
Our genes carry inherited blueprints of DNA sequences that determine our characteristics. Inside the center or nucleus of a cell, genes are located on twisted, double-stranded molecules of DNA called chromosomes. At both ends of every chromosome are stretches of DNA called telomeres - regions of highly repetitive DNA that essentially function as disposable buffers. These regions are of great importance because every time a cell divides, a small part of the DNA sequence at both ends of a chromosome is lost in the process - meaning that if telomeres didn’t exist, the main part of the chromosome - the part containing genes essential for life - would get shorter with each division.
Think of telomeres as the plastic tips on both ends of a shoelace. The plastic ends exist so that if the end of a shoelace gets damaged, shortened, or frayed, the soft cloth-like material that makes up the bulk of the shoelace will remain protected.
An enzyme named telomerase is able to add back bases to the ends of telomeres. Thus, in young cells, telomerase keeps telomeres from wearing down too much. But as cells divide repeatedly, the level of telomerase in the cell decreases, so the telomeres grow shorter and the cells age. When they get too short, the cell no longer can divide and becomes inactive or dies – meaning that the length of a person’s telomeres plays a role in how quickly they will age and eventually die.
Geneticist Richard Cawthon and colleagues at the University of Utah found that when people are divided into two groups based on telomere lengths, the half with longer telomeres lives five years longer than those with shorter telomeres – suggesting that if the people with the shorter telomeres could increase their telomere length to that of the people with longer telomeres, they could live five years longer.[6]
In human blood cells, the length of telomeres ranges from 8,000 DNA base pairs at birth to 3,000 DNA base pairs as people age and as low as 1,500 in elderly people. (An entire chromosome has about 150 million base pairs.) Each time a cell divides, the average person loses 30 to 200 base pairs from the ends of that cell’s telomeres.
The fact that different people lose telomere base pairs at different rates suggests that factors other than simple cell division also impact how rapidly telomeres shorten. Increasing evidence is pointing to the fact that the Th1 pathogens may play a significant role in determining the rate at which these sequences of DNA are lost, thus revealing yet another way in which the chronic bacterial forms may impact the aging process.
For one thing, the DNA of pathogens has been found integrated with telomere DNA. And as Marshall describes, if pathogens do directly alter our DNA, then the weakened DNA at the ends of telomeres provides some of the easiest genetic material for them to mutate.
A number of studies have revealed that people who suffer from diseases likely to be caused by the Th1 pathogens often display shorter telomeres. These diseases include cancer[7][8], heart disease[9][10], and Alzheimer’s[11]
For example, Cawthon’s study found that among people older than 60, those with shorter telomeres were three times more likely to die from heart disease and eight times more likely to die from infectious disease.
According to the Genetic Science Learning Center at the University of Utah, “Studies have found shortened telomeres in many cancers, including pancreatic, bone, prostate, bladder, lung, kidney, and head and neck.”[12]
In 2003, researchers at the UCLA School of Medicine found that patients with Alzheimer’s disease had shorter telomeres when compared to control subjects without Alzheimer’s.[13]
Similarly, the results of a recent study conducted by a team of researchers at the National Institute on Aging at the National Institutes of Health in Baltimore who assessed the telomere length of 41 people caring for loved ones with Alzheimer’s disease and 41 individuals matched by age who weren’t caring for an ill person. Caregivers had been looking after the Alzheimer’s patients for an average of five years.[14] The fact that bacteria almost certainly drive the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s is supported by a recent issue (May 2008) of Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease which was entirely dedicated to exploring the role of bacteria in causing Alzheimer’s.
The team reported in the Journal of Immunology that the telomeres of the Alzheimer’s caregivers were significantly shorter than those of the control individuals – suggesting that the Th1 pathogens from the Alzheimer’s patients had been transmitted to their caregivers over the course of the 5-year study period, shortening their telomeres in the process.
“So, it appears that in the patients with Alzheimer’s (and in the caregivers who are likely infected with the Th1 pathogens too), the telomeres are shortened,” says Joyce Waterhouse PhD of Autoimmunity Research Foundation. “I guess with our experience with the Marshall Protocol, we could conclude that Th1 disease and its associated inflammation cause this ‘premature aging.’” That view would go along with people seeming to get “younger” on the MP.
The fact that the caregivers displayed shorter telomeres does not necessarily mean that they will develop Alzheimer’s, although they may have a higher risk of developing other Th1 diseases associated with aging. In all cases, they should be comforted by the knowledge that the Marshall Protocol can prevent and reverse these illnesses.
Returning to the subject of shortened telomeres, it’s not surprising that researchers at Cedars-Sinai Research Institute and the University of California at Los Angeles also found shorter telomeres, suggesting premature aging, in patients with Lupus.[15] A team from Homberg Germany came to the same conclusion in patients with T-cell lymphoma.[16]
Futhermore, a variety of premature aging syndromes are associated with short telomeres. These include Werner Syndrome, Ataxia telangiectasia, Bloom syndrome, Nijmegen breakage syndrome and ataxia telangiectasia-like disorder. In all these diseases, genes have been mutated that affect telomere length in a manner yet to be determined.
What causes these genetic mutations? Pathogens are a likely candidate. Over thousands of years, bacteria, viruses, bacteriophages, and the Th1 pathogens have evolved mechanisms that allow them to mutate and alter the expression of the genes inside the cells they infect – meaning that the mutations observed in the above diseases could well be the result of bacterial infection.
Cawthon believes that if the telomere shortening process could be curbed, 10 to 30 years could be added to the average lifespan. Of course, the elimination of the Th1 pathogens won’t completely stop telomeres from shortening with cell division, but since these bacterial forms seem to accelerate the rate at which the telomere base pairs are lost, and everybody acquires significant levels of the Th1 pathogens as they grow older, it’s very possible that killing these bacteria could enhance the average lifespan.
What else does Cawthon implicate in aging? Oxidative stress, or damage to DNA, proteins and lipids (fatty substances) caused by oxidants, which are highly reactive substances containing oxygen. For example, in one study, scientists exposed worms to two substances that neutralize oxidants, and the worms’ lifespan increased an average 44 percent.
But consider this: what generates higher levels of these oxidants? According to Giunta, inflammaging. The inflammaging process generates Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) - causing both oxidative damage and amplifying the number of cytokines released by the immune system. This perpetuates “a vicious cycle resulting in a….. state where tissue injury and healing mechanisms proceed simultaneously and damage slowly accumulates asymptomatically over decades and is a major determinant both of the aging process and of the development of age-associated diseases,” states Giunta.
But it is likely the Th1 pathogens that cause this “vicious cycle” - stimulating the immune system, which subsequently releases ROS and cytokines in an effort to eliminate them. Thus, when the bacteria causing this immune response are killed, the cycle, and the age-related damage that accompanies it, come to an end.
Yet another way that the Marshall Protocol may affect the aging process is related to a chemical called Nuclear Factor Kappa beta (NF-kb). Just last week, scientists at Stanford University announced that they had successfully genetically altered mice so as to reduce the amount of NF-kB in their skin cells. Why? Because according to the researchers, the protein appears to control various aspects of the aging process.[17]
The team used a lotion that inhibited NF-kB in the mice. After two weeks of treatment with this cosmetic, the skin of older mice displayed the look and genetic profile of younger skin. The skin also became measurably thicker.
Interestingly, the Th1 pathogens greatly contribute to the rise of NF-kB in the body. They are able to activate proteins that increase the activity NF-kB, which subsequently moves to the nucleus or center of an infected cell and stimulates the release of cytokines.
By reducing the level of the Th1 pathogens in the body, patients on the Marshall Protocol should also lower NF-kB and other inflammatory cytokines over time. Furthermore, Benicar, the medication that patients take along with the antibiotics, actually helps block the production of NF-kB.
“We know NF-kappaB is a product of Th1 inflammation, and Benicar is supposed to stop its production by blocking the Angiotensin II receptor,” says Marshall.
Of course the Stanford study was conducted on mice so it’s far too soon to generalize the effects of lowering NK-kB to human beings. Yet the study paves the way for a better understanding of how the proteins affected by the Th1 pathogens may contribute to the aging process.
It is also becoming increasingly clear that the Th1 pathogens have, over millions of years, evolved the ability to directly alter the activity of the body’s hormones, enzymes and receptors.
Marshall has isolated one species of bacteria capable of creating a molecule that binds and blocks the Vitamin D Receptor – a fundamental receptor of the body that controls not just the expression of thousands of genes, but the activity of the innate immune system and the production of the antimicrobial peptides.[2][18] More bacteria with this same capability are likely to be identified in the coming years.
Thus, may be possible that at some point in every person’s life, it is inevitable that the bacteria they have accumulated will start to shut down the VDR, slowing the body’s ability to fight the pathogens responsible for causing the inflammation, oxidative stress, accelerated telomere shortening and perhaps other processes associated with aging.
If this proves to be the case, is the gradual deactivation of the VDR part of a natural process that gradually shifts every human being into the later phases of life, where the body loses its youthful resiliency?
After all, humans and bacteria have evolved side by side. Most of the cells in our bodies are not our own, they are bacterial. In fact, the bacteria in our bodies add up to more than 100 trillion cells. According to mainstream medicine, these cells are limited to our intestinal tract, but increasing evidence points to the fact that many bacteria also parasitize our other cells and live in biofilms within our tissues. Because our bodies are made of only some several trillion human cells, we are somewhat outnumbered by the pathogens.
With this in mind, is it possible that some of the trillions of bacteria are relatively harmless species involved purely in the aging process? According to Marshall, one could construct a hypothesis where relatively harmless species in biofilms have, over the course of millions of years, perfected the ability to gradually shut down the body’s receptors and hormonal systems as it ages.
The fact that an increasing number of people are developing diseases in which symptoms of aging appear earlier in life may simply be a reaction to vitamin D supplementation, immunosuppressive medications and beta-lactam antibiotics - all of which have allowed these bacteria to shut down the body’s hormonal control systems at a younger age.
Indeed, “premature aging” is a good way to describe the effects of increased inflammation, decreased telomere length, and the gradual deactivation of the body’s receptors. Those people who develop a full-fledged Th1 disease at a young age often complain of aches, pains, fatigue, brain fog, osteoporosis - all symptoms that are often considered “normal” in elderly people.
But people who suffer from diseases caused by the Th1 pathogens can now kill the bacteria causing “premature aging” by using the Marshall Protocol. Does this suggest that the elderly, who have accumulated similar forms of bacteria, or who harbor pathogens purely involved in the aging process, can also reverse the symptoms of aging by using the MP? It seems quite possible. Especially since, as described above, many patients who reach the later stages of the MP report feeling younger than when they started.
Consider that an infant not exposed to the Th1 pathogens in the womb begins life with a low pathogen load, no inflammation, little oxidative stress, telomeres that shorten at a slow rate, no VDR blockage, and healthy stem cells capable of efficiently repairing the tissues. Evidence so far suggests that patients who complete the MP regain these same attributes, thus returning to what could be described as a child-like state.
“Experts in the field of immunology are increasingly pointing to the fact that the aging of the immune system is a main factor influencing longevity,” states Dr. Greg Blaney. “As people grow older, their immune systems are forced to deal with higher bacterial loads, which in turn means they have to manage a greater inflammatory response. The MP downregulates this inflammatory response, restoring the agility of the immune system, which significantly affects the aging process.”
Obviously, it’s much too soon to draw any definite conclusions about the Th1 pathogens and aging as many of the potential roles that these pathogens play in the aging process are still based on speculation. And even if these intraphagocytic metagenomic bacteria are eliminated, who knows what other systems of the body may step in to circumscribe the human lifespan?
Then again, case reports from patients who have reached the late stages of the Marshall Protocol are highly encouraging. Once the Th1 pathogens have been killed, the body is demonstrating a remarkable ability to bounce back.
“We are also observing that the body has an amazing ability to regenerate after inflammatory damage which is currently considered to be ‘permanent’ (eg, fibrosis and peripheral neuropathy),” states Marshall.
In fact, progress reports are revealing that both physical and cognitive abilities are able to heal. “We have seen no sign that the brain doesn’t heal,” says Marshall. “The adults recover all their lost faculties as they heal on the MP, and the several children on the MP, who have had a variety of difficulties, also are recovering fully. So our data (at this point) shows that the body heals as bacteria are killed and immune function is restored.”
10 Responses for "Aging and the resurrection of the immune system"
Great overview of Th1 and aging, thanks. I’ve been following the healthy life extension community for some time, and I’m always glad to see investigations in this area. It can be frustrating hearing gerontology researchers keep discussing gene expressions but not what might be influencing the genes. I notice that they keep seeing the same things that Dr. Marshall is seeing–inflammation, hormonal and enzymatic imbalances, similarities among the different Th1 diagnoses–and I’m eagerly waiting for the day when they finally find and incorporate the understanding of the role of L-form bacteria.
I really like the style of your articles. Very informative and easy to follow. Thanks!
//Erik
>>”many patients who reach the later stages of the MP report feeling younger than when they started”
As you began this excellent blog with a quote from me (“I’m sixty going on sixteen”) I feel a little bit responsible for encouraging the view that the MP can somehow reverse the aging process. So I stopped to think what I meant by that rather careless remark.
Let’s be honest: I didn’t really mean 16. When I fell ill with sarcoidosis, I lost my concentration, my memory, my ability to read with understanding, my ability to hold an intelligent conversation, my reasoning powers, my mathematical ability… and with it all came the fatigue that made every little thing too much of an effort.
All these things made me feel old in my mid-fifties - well, young Amy, I suppose that does sound old to you!! But my mother, who died riddled with cancer at the age of 84, had a mind vastly sharper than the pulp that mine had become.
So when I say that I now feel younger again, I suppose what I really mean is, that the signs of premature aging that I was suffering from because of my disease have now gone away on the MP. This is probably how a 60-year-old is meant to feel! And the relief of getting my brain back is enough to make me feel younger because it takes me back to where I was before I was so ill.
Why am I saying this, which could be taken as a negative comment, when I’m so enthusiastic for the MP? Simply because I think we should keep things in perspective. The MP is not the mythical elixir of youth. It could give us a healthier old age, but we will still grow old and die. That’s the destiny we have chosen for ourselves by failing to heed the manufacturer’s instructions (Genesis 3:19). “It is the blight man was born for.” (G M Hopkins)
Julia,
I, and probably everybody else, too, took your comment about “16″ to be the colloquial hyperbole it was intended to be. Please don’t feel like you said something wrong.
Healthy life extension and the defeat of aging are vital (and IMHO important) research directions, however, and it is possible that Dr. Marshall’s findings may contribute to their success. I don’t expect the MP to stop or reverse my aging, but I consider it one of the best things I can do if I want to still be alive when and if the cure for aging is found.
Highly interesting, but it seems vitamin D could slow ageing and effect telomere length too.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7083323.stm
MP then is just another way of doing it. An expensive way that only benefits a minority.
May I point out that immunosuppressiveness is not comparative to immunodeficiency, there are valid reasons for stopping the immune system going to war with itself on some areas.
Not everyone achieves vitamin D dysregulation, so for most, vitamin D - a bit of sun on our skin like plants and other animals - is essential. Instead of MP wouldn’t it be better to find out what’s causing the dysregulation?
Hi Mo,
Thanks for your interest in this article but in terms of your comments I think you are very confused about the latest science described on this site.
It’s critical that you read the article I have written about vitamin D:
http://bacteriality.com/2007/09/15/vitamind/
Vitamin D does NOT influence lifespan or telomere length and I’m not sure where you got that impression. Vitamin D isn’t even a vitamin - it’s precursor form is a secosteroid that slows the activity of the immune system. Any study that reveals a “benefit” of vitamin D is only picking up on it’s immunosuppressive effects.
Second, immunosuppressedness is exactly the same thing as immunodeficiency, why? Critical this understanding it the fact that the immune system does NOT “go to war with itself.” The concept of autoimmune disease is on it’s way out and it is now understood that the immune system is not attacking itself. Rather, bacteria in the tissues cause the immune system to release the cytokines that generate inflammation. This means that the immune system should always be active - so that these bacteria can be killed and kept in check.
I’m really not sure what you mean by the last comment. Dr. Marshall’s research has clarified exactly what dysregulation (at the molecular level) is occurring in patients with inflammatory disease. Namely an increase in substances (many created by bacteria) that block the vitamin D receptor, thus slowing the activity of the innate immune system, the antimicrobial peptides, and the transcription of thousands of genes.
Last, but not least, the MP not an expensive treatment and almost anyone can participate. The nurse moderators on the MP site answer your questions for free, there is not charge to use the board or get advice. Everyone helping patients is a volunteer. The cost of the antibiotics is relatively cheap. Benicar costs more, but can be ordered at a better price from Germany.
I urge you to read more of the information on this site and also on the MP study site. There is a wealth of new concepts that must be understood if one is to truly understand the MP and the effects of vitamin D.
Best,
Amy
Hi Julia,
I understand that your statement was just an expression of the fact that you feel good. But perhaps the fact that you are feeling better than you have in many years does support the point that I was trying to make with this piece.
There are no guarantees in this article - only hypotheses. But everything I wrote was backed up by scientific evidence and logical reasoning.
Most of us are so used to hearing that we will age - that our health will deteriorate and then we will die.
But I urge you to think big. Consider the idea that aging is actually a process that is greatly affected by the pathogens we carry. Consider that debilitation may not have to accompany old age, and that the removal of the bacteria causing the symptoms of old age can very well make people feel younger and live longer lives. Perhaps aging can be viewed as a disease itself, something that the MP can truly impact.
When you stop to think about it, what is aging? Why do some 40 year-olds feel like they can run marathons while others start to get wrinkles, aches, and pains? The bottom line - one person has accumulated more bacteria than the other person.
Giunta and others in the field of aging implicate inflammation (cytokine release) and oxidative stress as the main reasons why our bodies age. And it appears that bacteria are responsible for causing these processes.
In the end this inflammation, oxidative stress, and VDR deactivation affects EVERYONE - playing a huge role in why people age.
But for the first time ever, the MP mitigates all of these factors - leaving, people, as I described in the article, with bodies working similar to those of a child. Add to this the fact that once L-form bacteria are killed the body has shown great ability to repair old damage. After all, the body is constantly producing new cells, new bone cells etc.
I encourage you not to confine your thinking - it is very possible that with all of the above factors at play the MP can affect aging. In many ways the MP is more than just a treatment for certain specific illness symptoms. You may very well be killing bacteria that are purely involved in the aging process - bacteria that for over millions of years have lived with humans and contributed to aging, but for the first time in history are being killed.
Who knows what may result? I didn’t write this article to advertise the MP or to make it look good. I wrote it because I genuinely believe that the treatment shows great promise when it comes to affecting the aging process. I wrote what I wrote because everything I wrote is scientifically plausible.
So when you say “Simply because I think we should keep things in perspective. The MP is not the mythical elixir of youth. It could give us a healthier old age, but we will still grow old and die. That’s the destiny we have chosen for ourselves by failing to heed the manufacturer’s instructions (Genesis 3:19). “It is the blight man was born for.” (G M Hopkins)”
…I don’t agree. We are not necessarily born to age in the manner that we do. Perhaps it is time to let go of these old perspectives. Dr. Marshall’s research and the emerging field of Inflammaging actually show the urgency of creating a NEW perspective.
Best,
Amy
Hi Shegeek,
Thanks for your comments. It’s interesting that you have been following research about aging, and I agree- somebody needs to let most of these researchers know about L-form bacteria!
I also follow this area with great interest as I personally think it is one of the most interesting areas of research that has been affected by Dr. Marshall’s work.
Best,
Amy
It’s a good, informative article, but I had problem with you stating rather categorically that L-form bacteria were responsible for shorter telomeres in Parkinson caregivers - when most research simply correlates stress with shorter telomeres. It appears that infection with L-form bacteria is just one of many causes of telomere shortenning.
Off topic, regarding the common mistake in use of the verb “effect” instead of “affect”. It seems the more people make this mistake, the more it spreads. Please fix it.
Hi Alex,
Thanks for noticing the grammar mistake. It has been corrected and my copy editor has been unceremoniously beheaded.
About the telomeres, yes stress has been pegged as a factor for why they shorten, but infection is one of the greatest causes of stress.
Many Th1 diseases are often blamed incorrectly on “stress” as if the patients is too stressed out and if they just adjusted to a calmer lifestyle they would recover. This is a myth, and I wonder if the researchers who attribute telomere shortening to stress are just following this same mindset because they are completely unaware of the infectious component. IMO, stress is all too often a scapegoat and I find the presence of L-form bacteria to be a much more reasonable explanation for shortened telomeres.
Best,
Amy
Leave a reply